Learn how ownCloud and Peergos differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these cloud file sync & share tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Repository

Both ownCloud and Peergos have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with ownCloud having 2,104 stars and Peergos having 2,451 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, ownCloud has 268 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
ownCloud is growing faster, adding 18 stars in the last 30 days (+0.9%) against adding 14 stars for Peergos (+0.6%). ownCloud is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with ownCloud last updated 3 hours ago and Peergos 11 hours ago.
Peergos has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to ownCloud which began 7 years ago. This 6.1-year head start suggests Peergos may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: ownCloud is licensed under Apache-2.0 while Peergos uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Cloud File Sync & Share. However, they also have distinct specializations: ownCloud also focuses on Cloud Storage while Peergos extends into Distributed Storage, Encrypted Storage.
ownCloud provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Peergos may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.