Learn how Firefiles and ownCloud differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these cloud file sync & share tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

ownCloud appears to have several advantages over Firefiles, particularly in popularity, growth, activity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
ownCloud significantly outpaces Firefiles in community adoption with 2,104 stars compared to 371 stars on GitHub. This 5.7x difference suggests ownCloud has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, ownCloud has 268 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
ownCloud is growing faster, adding 18 stars in the last 30 days (+0.9%) against adding 0 stars for Firefiles (0%). ownCloud is both larger and pulling further ahead.
ownCloud shows more recent development activity with its last commit 3 hours ago, while Firefiles was last updated 10 months ago. This suggests ownCloud is being more actively maintained.
ownCloud has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Firefiles which began 5 years ago. This 2.3-year head start suggests ownCloud may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Firefiles is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while ownCloud uses Apache-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Cloud File Sync & Share, Cloud Storage. However, they also have distinct specializations: Firefiles also focuses on File Management.
Both Firefiles and ownCloud offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs