Learn how Cryptomator and Peergos differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these encrypted storage tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Repository

Cryptomator appears to have several advantages over Peergos, particularly in popularity and growth. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Cryptomator significantly outpaces Peergos in community adoption with 16,310 stars compared to 2,532 stars on GitHub. This 6.4x difference suggests Cryptomator has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Cryptomator has 1,538 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Cryptomator is growing faster, adding 170 stars in the last 30 days (+1.1%) against adding 14 stars for Peergos (+0.6%). Cryptomator is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Cryptomator last updated 9 hours ago and Peergos 2 days ago.
Both projects started around the same time, with Cryptomator beginning 13 years ago and Peergos 13 years ago.
The projects use different licenses: Cryptomator is licensed under GPL-3.0 while Peergos uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Encrypted Storage. However, they also have distinct specializations: Peergos extends into Cloud File Sync & Share.