Learn how Cryptomator and Peergos differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these encrypted storage tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
9 hours agoRepository age
13 yearsVersion
1.19.6License
GPL-3.0Repository
cryptomator
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
13 yearsLicense
AGPL-3.0Repository
peergos/peergos
Cryptomator appears to have several advantages over Peergos, particularly in popularity and growth. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Cryptomator significantly outpaces Peergos in community adoption with 16,453 stars compared to 2,549 stars on GitHub. This 6.5x difference suggests Cryptomator has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Cryptomator has 1,503 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Cryptomator is growing faster, adding 202 stars in the last 30 days (+1.2%) against adding 19 stars for Peergos (+0.8%). Cryptomator is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Cryptomator last updated 9 hours ago and Peergos 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Java. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Cryptomator uses CSS while Peergos leverages Bash.
Both projects started around the same time, with Cryptomator beginning 13 years ago and Peergos 13 years ago.
The projects use different licenses: Cryptomator is licensed under GPL-3.0 while Peergos uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Encrypted Storage. However, they also have distinct specializations: Peergos extends into Cloud File Sync & Share.