Learn how Peergos and Sync-in differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these cloud file sync & share tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Peergos and Sync-in have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Peergos having 2,446 stars and Sync-in having 1,640 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Peergos has 193 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Sync-in is growing faster, adding 58 stars in the last 30 days (+3.7%) against adding 12 stars for Peergos (+0.5%). Sync-in is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Peergos last updated 2 days ago and Sync-in 13 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Peergos uses Java while Sync-in leverages JavaScript, Typescript, SCSS, NestJS.
Peergos has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Sync-in which began 1 year ago. This 12.1-year head start suggests Peergos may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Cloud File Sync & Share. However, they also have distinct specializations: Peergos also focuses on Distributed Storage, Encrypted Storage while Sync-in extends into Collaborative Workspaces, Secure Document Sharing.
Sync-in provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Peergos may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.