Learn how OpenCloud and Sync-in differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these cloud file sync & share tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Activity score

Activity score

Both OpenCloud and Sync-in have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenCloud significantly outpaces Sync-in in community adoption with 5,667 stars compared to 1,497 stars on GitHub. This 3.8x difference suggests OpenCloud has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OpenCloud has 214 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with OpenCloud last updated 14 hours ago and Sync-in 3 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OpenCloud uses CSS, JSX, Golang, PHP while Sync-in leverages SCSS, NestJS.
Both projects started around the same time, with OpenCloud beginning 1 year ago and Sync-in 1 year ago.
The projects use different licenses: OpenCloud is licensed under Apache-2.0 while Sync-in uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Cloud File Sync & Share. However, they also have distinct specializations: Sync-in extends into Collaborative Workspaces, Secure Document Sharing.
Both OpenCloud and Sync-in offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs