Learn how OpenCloud and Sync-in differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these cloud file sync & share tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Both OpenCloud and Sync-in have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenCloud significantly outpaces Sync-in in community adoption with 5,564 stars compared to 1,438 stars on GitHub. This 3.9x difference suggests OpenCloud has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OpenCloud has 208 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with OpenCloud last updated 9 hours ago and Sync-in 8 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OpenCloud uses CSS, JSX, Golang, PHP while Sync-in leverages SCSS, NestJS.
Both projects started around the same time, with OpenCloud beginning 1 year ago and Sync-in 11 months ago.
The projects use different licenses: OpenCloud is licensed under Apache-2.0 while Sync-in uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Cloud File Sync & Share. However, they also have distinct specializations: Sync-in extends into Collaborative Workspaces, Secure Document Sharing.
Both OpenCloud and Sync-in offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs