Learn how Papra and Sync-in differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these secure document sharing tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
12 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
0.2.6License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
papra-hq/papra
Last 30 days
Last commit
12 hours agoRepository age
1 yearVersion
v2.6.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
sync-in/server
Both Papra and Sync-in have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Papra leads in popularity with 5,586 stars vs 1,943 stars for Sync-in. The 187% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Papra has 313 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Sync-in is growing faster, adding 171 stars in the last 30 days (+9.7%) against adding 78 stars for Papra (+1.4%). Sync-in is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Papra last updated 12 hours ago and Sync-in 12 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Papra uses CSS, JSX while Sync-in leverages Bash, SCSS, NestJS.
Both projects started around the same time, with Papra beginning 2 years ago and Sync-in 1 year ago.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Secure Document Sharing. However, they also have distinct specializations: Papra also focuses on Document Management Systems while Sync-in extends into Cloud File Sync & Share, Collaborative Workspaces.
Both Papra and Sync-in offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.