Learn how Nextcloud and Sync-in differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these collaborative workspaces is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Nextcloud appears to have several advantages over Sync-in, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Nextcloud significantly outpaces Sync-in in community adoption with 34,722 stars compared to 1,124 stars on GitHub. This 30.9x difference suggests Nextcloud has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Nextcloud has 4,834 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Nextcloud last updated 5 hours ago and Sync-in 23 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Nextcloud uses CSS, PHP, Vue while Sync-in leverages NestJS.
Nextcloud has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Sync-in which began 10 months ago. This 9.2-year head start suggests Nextcloud may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Collaborative Workspaces, Cloud File Sync & Share. However, they also have distinct specializations: Nextcloud also focuses on Storage while Sync-in extends into Secure Document Sharing.
Both Nextcloud and Sync-in offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.