Learn how Nextcloud and Sync-in differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these collaborative workspaces is best for you.
Activity score

Activity score

Nextcloud appears to have several advantages over Sync-in, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Nextcloud significantly outpaces Sync-in in community adoption with 35,911 stars compared to 1,473 stars on GitHub. This 24.4x difference suggests Nextcloud has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Nextcloud has 5,018 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Nextcloud last updated 5 hours ago and Sync-in 14 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Nextcloud uses CSS, Vue, PHP while Sync-in leverages NestJS.
Nextcloud has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Sync-in which began 1 year ago. This 9.2-year head start suggests Nextcloud may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Collaborative Workspaces, Cloud File Sync & Share. However, they also have distinct specializations: Nextcloud also focuses on Storage while Sync-in extends into Secure Document Sharing.
Both Nextcloud and Sync-in offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.