Learn how Ente and Immich differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these photo & video management tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Ente and Immich have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Immich significantly outpaces Ente in community adoption with 115,257 stars compared to 29,150 stars on GitHub. This 4.0x difference suggests Immich has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Immich has 7,092 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Ente and Immich are moving at much the same rate, adding 573 stars and adding 2,260 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+2% vs +2%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Ente last updated 20 hours ago and Immich 20 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, C, Objective-C, Swift, Ruby, C++, Kotlin, Dart. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Ente uses Next.js, Golang, Rust, Java, Tauri while Immich leverages SvelteKit, NestJS.
Both projects started around the same time, with Ente beginning 4 years ago and Immich 5 years ago.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Photo & Video Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: Ente also focuses on Encrypted Storage.
Both Ente and Immich offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.