Learn how Ente and Immich differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these photo & video management tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Immich appears to have several advantages over Ente, particularly in popularity and growth. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Immich significantly outpaces Ente in community adoption with 111,725 stars compared to 28,417 stars on GitHub. This 3.9x difference suggests Immich has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Immich has 6,621 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Immich is growing faster, adding 3,438 stars in the last 30 days (+3.2%) against adding 519 stars for Ente (+1.9%). Immich is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Ente last updated 11 hours ago and Immich 8 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, C, Objective-C, Swift, C++, Ruby, Kotlin, Dart. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Ente uses Next.js, Golang, Rust, Java, Tauri while Immich leverages SvelteKit, NestJS.
Both projects started around the same time, with Ente beginning 4 years ago and Immich 5 years ago.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Photo & Video Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: Ente also focuses on Cloud Storage, Encrypted Storage while Immich extends into Storage.
Both Ente and Immich offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.