Learn how Immich and Piwigo differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these photo & video management tools is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Both Immich and Piwigo have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Immich significantly outpaces Piwigo in community adoption with 98,278 stars compared to 3,775 stars on GitHub. This 26.0x difference suggests Immich has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Immich has 5,436 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Immich last updated 5 hours ago and Piwigo 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Immich uses Typescript, JSX, Python, C, Objective-C, Ruby, C++, Swift, Kotlin, SvelteKit, NestJS, Dart while Piwigo leverages SCSS, PHP, Perl.
Piwigo has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Immich which began 4 years ago. This 6.6-year head start suggests Piwigo may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Immich is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while Piwigo uses GPL-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Photo & Video Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: Immich also focuses on Storage.
Both Immich and Piwigo offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.