Learn how Lychee and Piwigo differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these photo & video management tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Lychee and Piwigo have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Lychee having 4,311 stars and Piwigo having 3,866 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Piwigo has 487 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Lychee and Piwigo are moving at much the same rate, adding 14 stars and adding 7 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.3% vs +0.2%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Lychee last updated 1 day ago and Piwigo 4 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with CSS, Bash, PHP. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Lychee uses Typescript, Vue, Laravel while Piwigo leverages JavaScript, SCSS, Perl.
Piwigo has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Lychee which began 8 years ago. This 3.1-year head start suggests Piwigo may have more mature features and established processes.
Lychee uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Piwigo's GPL-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Photo & Video Management, Image Hosting. However, they also have distinct specializations: Piwigo extends into Business DAM.
Both Lychee and Piwigo offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.