Learn how Immich and Lychee differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these photo & video management tools is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Both Immich and Lychee have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Immich significantly outpaces Lychee in community adoption with 98,278 stars compared to 4,140 stars on GitHub. This 23.7x difference suggests Immich has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Immich has 5,436 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Immich last updated 5 hours ago and Lychee 12 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Immich uses JavaScript, JSX, Python, C, Objective-C, Ruby, C++, Swift, Kotlin, SvelteKit, NestJS, Dart while Lychee leverages PHP, Vue, Laravel.
Lychee has been in development longer, starting 8 years ago, compared to Immich which began 4 years ago. This 3.5-year head start suggests Lychee may have more mature features and established processes.
Lychee uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Immich's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Photo & Video Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: Immich also focuses on Storage.
Both Immich and Lychee offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.