Learn how Immich and Lychee differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these photo & video management tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Immich and Lychee have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Immich significantly outpaces Lychee in community adoption with 115,257 stars compared to 4,306 stars on GitHub. This 26.8x difference suggests Immich has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Immich has 7,092 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Immich is growing faster, adding 2,260 stars in the last 30 days (+2%) against adding 40 stars for Lychee (+0.9%). Immich is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Immich last updated 3 hours ago and Lychee 13 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Immich uses JavaScript, JSX, Python, C, Objective-C, Swift, Ruby, C++, Kotlin, SvelteKit, NestJS, Dart while Lychee leverages Vue, PHP, Laravel.
Lychee has been in development longer, starting 8 years ago, compared to Immich which began 5 years ago. This 3.5-year head start suggests Lychee may have more mature features and established processes.
Lychee uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Immich's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Photo & Video Management.
Both Immich and Lychee offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.