Ente significantly outpaces Hoodik in community adoption with 28,128 stars compared to 1,391 stars on GitHub. This 20.2x difference suggests Ente has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Ente has 1,740 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Both projects show recent activity, with Ente last updated 2 hours ago and Hoodik 6 days ago.

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, Rust. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Ente uses JSX, Python, Next.js, Golang, C, Objective-C, Java, Swift, C++, Ruby, Kotlin, Tauri, Dart while Hoodik leverages Vue.

Both projects started around the same time, with Ente beginning 4 years ago and Hoodik 4 years ago.

Ente is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Hoodik's license terms are not publicly specified.

Both tools serve similar use cases in Cloud Storage. However, they also have distinct specializations: Ente also focuses on Photo & Video Management, Encrypted Storage while Hoodik extends into Cloud File Sync & Share.

Both Ente and Hoodik offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.