What is the main difference between Puter and Seafile?

Puter and Seafile are both cloud file sync & share tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Puter or Seafile?

The choice between Puter and Seafile depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Puter to Seafile?

Migration between Puter and Seafile is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

InfluxDB – The purpose-built time series platform for high-velocity ingestion and real-time queries at scale.

Learn More

Puter vs Seafile

Learn how Puter and Seafile differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these cloud file sync & share tools is best for you.

Puter

Puter is a cloud-based desktop OS you run in the browser, with built-in apps, file storage, and support for hosting web apps and sites.

Visit Puter Read more

43,518stars+464(+1.1%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
11 hours ago
Repository age
3 years
Version
26.09
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
heyputer/puter

Seafile

Open source file sync and sharing platform with custom properties, AI automation, collaborative editing, and enterprise-grade security for teams.

Visit Seafile Read more

15,240stars+132(+0.9%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
17 days ago
Repository age
14 years
Version
v9.0.5
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
haiwen/seafile

Detailed Comparison

Both Puter and Seafile have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Puter wins

Community & Popularity

Puter leads in popularity with 43,518 stars vs 15,240 stars for Seafile. The 186% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Puter has 4,051 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Comparable

Growth Momentum

Puter and Seafile are moving at much the same rate, adding 464 stars and adding 132 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1.1% vs +0.9%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Puter last updated 11 hours ago and Seafile 17 days ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Puter uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript while Seafile leverages Python, C, Objective-C, C++.

Seafile wins

Project Maturity

Seafile has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Puter which began 3 years ago. This 11.8-year head start suggests Seafile may have more mature features and established processes.

Puter wins

Licensing

Puter is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Seafile's license terms are not publicly specified.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Cloud File Sync & Share. However, they also have distinct specializations: Puter also focuses on Cloud Storage, Encrypted Storage while Seafile extends into Document Management Systems, Secure Document Sharing.

Comparable