Logto – Modern auth infrastructure for developers. Add multi-tenancy, enterprise SSO, and RBAC to your SaaS or AI apps.Learn how Papra and Seafile differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these document management systems is best for you.
Both Papra and Seafile have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Seafile leads in popularity with 15,065 stars vs 5,099 stars for Papra. The 195% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Seafile has 1,667 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Papra last updated 5 days ago and Seafile 6 days ago.
Papra uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX while Seafile leverages Bash, Python, C, Objective-C, C++.
Seafile has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Papra which began 2 years ago. This 12.7-year head start suggests Seafile may have more mature features and established processes.
Papra is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Seafile's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Document Management Systems, Secure Document Sharing. However, they also have distinct specializations: Seafile extends into Cloud File Sync & Share.
Papra provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Seafile may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
Seafilevs
NextcloudActivity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Repository
