Learn how Papra and Seafile differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these document management systems is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
6 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
0.2.6License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
papra-hq/papra
Last 30 days
Last commit
9 days agoRepository age
14 yearsVersion
v9.0.5Self-hosted
YesRepository
haiwen/seafile
Both Papra and Seafile have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Seafile leads in popularity with 15,378 stars vs 5,592 stars for Papra. The 175% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Seafile has 1,675 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Papra is growing faster, adding 80 stars in the last 30 days (+1.5%) against adding 104 stars for Seafile (+0.7%). Papra is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Papra last updated 6 hours ago and Seafile 9 days ago.
Papra uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX while Seafile leverages Bash, Python, C, Objective-C, C++.
Seafile has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Papra which began 2 years ago. This 12.7-year head start suggests Seafile may have more mature features and established processes.
Papra is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Seafile's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Document Management Systems, Secure Document Sharing. However, they also have distinct specializations: Seafile extends into Cloud File Sync & Share.
Both Papra and Seafile offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.