Learn how Papra and Seafile differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these document management systems is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Repository

Both Papra and Seafile have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Seafile leads in popularity with 15,164 stars vs 5,233 stars for Papra. The 190% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Seafile has 1,675 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Papra is growing faster, adding 176 stars in the last 30 days (+3.5%) against adding 141 stars for Seafile (+0.9%). Papra is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Papra last updated 2 days ago and Seafile 16 days ago.
Papra uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX while Seafile leverages Bash, Python, C, Objective-C, C++.
Seafile has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Papra which began 2 years ago. This 12.7-year head start suggests Seafile may have more mature features and established processes.
Papra is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Seafile's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Document Management Systems, Secure Document Sharing. However, they also have distinct specializations: Seafile extends into Cloud File Sync & Share.
Papra provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Seafile may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.