Learn how Mattermost and Rocket.Chat differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these collaborative workspaces is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Both Mattermost and Rocket.Chat have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Mattermost having 36,224 stars and Rocket.Chat having 45,155 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Rocket.Chat has 13,524 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Mattermost last updated 8 hours ago and Rocket.Chat 8 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Mattermost uses Golang while Rocket.Chat leverages Meteor.
Both projects started around the same time, with Mattermost beginning 11 years ago and Rocket.Chat 11 years ago.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Collaborative Workspaces, Team Chat & Messaging. However, they also have distinct specializations: Mattermost also focuses on Encrypted Communication while Rocket.Chat extends into Video Conferencing & Virtual Office.
Both Mattermost and Rocket.Chat offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs