What is the main difference between Macro Chat and Mattermost?

Macro Chat and Mattermost are both team chat & messaging tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Macro Chat or Mattermost?

The choice between Macro Chat and Mattermost depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Macro Chat to Mattermost?

Migration between Macro Chat and Mattermost is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Postiz – The All-in-One agentic social media scheduling tool

Learn more

Macro Chat vs Mattermost

Learn how Macro Chat and Mattermost differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.

Macro Chat

Team chat app with inline threads, mention-based sharing, a unified inbox for chat and email, and an AI agent that works across your full workspace.

Visit Macro Chat Read more

6,083stars+1,543(+34%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
8 hours ago
Repository age
1 year
Version
v2026.11.2.0
License
AGPL-3.0
Repository
macro-inc/macro

Mattermost

Mattermost provides a flexible, open-source platform for secure team collaboration, designed for organizations with strict security and privacy requirements.

Visit Mattermost Read more

39,510stars+258(+0.7%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
9 hours ago
Repository age
11 years
Version
v12.0.1
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
mattermost

Detailed Comparison

Both Macro Chat and Mattermost have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Mattermost wins

Community & Popularity

Mattermost significantly outpaces Macro Chat in community adoption with 39,510 stars compared to 6,083 stars on GitHub. This 6.5x difference suggests Mattermost has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Mattermost has 9,087 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Macro Chat wins

Growth Momentum

Macro Chat is growing faster, adding 1,543 stars in the last 30 days (+34%) against adding 258 stars for Mattermost (+0.7%). Macro Chat is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Macro Chat last updated 8 hours ago and Mattermost 9 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Macro Chat uses Python, Rust, C, Objective-C, Swift, Kotlin, Tauri while Mattermost leverages Golang, SCSS.

Mattermost wins

Project Maturity

Mattermost has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Macro Chat which began 1 year ago. This 10.6-year head start suggests Mattermost may have more mature features and established processes.

Macro Chat wins

Licensing

Macro Chat is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Mattermost's license terms are not publicly specified.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging. However, they also have distinct specializations: Mattermost extends into Collaborative Workspaces, Encrypted Communication.

Mattermost wins

Hosting & Deployment

Mattermost provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Macro Chat may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.