Learn how Macro Chat and Mattermost differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Mattermost appears to have several advantages over Macro Chat, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Mattermost significantly outpaces Macro Chat in community adoption with 38,541 stars compared to 585 stars on GitHub. This 65.9x difference suggests Mattermost has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Mattermost has 8,853 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Macro Chat last updated 50 minutes ago and Mattermost 47 minutes ago.
Mattermost has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Macro Chat which began 9 months ago. This 10.6-year head start suggests Mattermost may have more mature features and established processes.
Macro Chat is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Mattermost's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging. However, they also have distinct specializations: Mattermost extends into Collaborative Workspaces, Encrypted Communication.
Mattermost provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Macro Chat may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs