What is the main difference between Fluxer and Macro Chat?

Fluxer and Macro Chat are both team chat & messaging tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Fluxer or Macro Chat?

The choice between Fluxer and Macro Chat depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Fluxer to Macro Chat?

Migration between Fluxer and Macro Chat is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

InfluxDB – The purpose-built time series platform for high-velocity ingestion and real-time queries at scale.

Learn More

Fluxer vs Macro Chat

Learn how Fluxer and Macro Chat differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.

Fluxer

Free, open-source instant messaging and VoIP platform with full Markdown support, voice/video calls, moderation tools, and self-hosting options for communities.

Visit Fluxer Read more

10,166stars+289(+2.9%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
10 hours ago
Repository age
8 months
Version
2026.902.161550
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
fluxerapp/fluxer

Sponsor Fluxer ongithub.com

Macro Chat

Team chat app with inline threads, mention-based sharing, a unified inbox for chat and email, and an AI agent that works across your full workspace.

Visit Macro Chat Read more

4,175stars+3,460(+484%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
8 hours ago
Repository age
10 months
Version
v2026.9.1.0
License
AGPL-3.0
Repository
macro-inc/macro

Detailed Comparison

Both Fluxer and Macro Chat have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Fluxer wins

Community & Popularity

Fluxer leads in popularity with 10,166 stars vs 4,175 stars for Macro Chat. The 143% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Fluxer has 732 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Macro Chat wins

Growth Momentum

Macro Chat is growing faster, adding 3,460 stars in the last 30 days (+484%) against adding 289 stars for Fluxer (+2.9%). Macro Chat is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Fluxer last updated 10 hours ago and Macro Chat 8 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, Rust. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Fluxer uses Golang, Ruby while Macro Chat leverages C, Objective-C, Swift, Kotlin, Tauri.

Comparable

Project Maturity

Both projects started around the same time, with Fluxer beginning 8 months ago and Macro Chat 10 months ago.

Comparable

Licensing

Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging. However, they also have distinct specializations: Fluxer also focuses on Encrypted Communication.

Fluxer wins

Hosting & Deployment

Fluxer provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Macro Chat may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.