What is the main difference between Fluxer and Macro Chat?

Fluxer and Macro Chat are both team chat & messaging tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Fluxer or Macro Chat?

The choice between Fluxer and Macro Chat depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Fluxer to Macro Chat?

Migration between Fluxer and Macro Chat is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Logto – Modern auth infrastructure for developers. Add multi-tenancy, enterprise SSO, and RBAC to your SaaS or AI apps.

Learn More

Learn more

Fluxer vs Macro Chat

Learn how Fluxer and Macro Chat differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.

Fluxer

Free, open-source instant messaging and VoIP platform with full Markdown support, voice/video calls, moderation tools, and self-hosting options for communities.

Visit Fluxer Read more

Activity score
91/100
Stars
9,783
Forks
657
Last commit
2 hours ago
Repository age
7 months
Version
2026.723.160908
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
fluxerapp/fluxer

Macro Chat

Team chat app with inline threads, @mention-based sharing, a unified inbox for chat and email, and an AI agent that works across your full workspace.

Visit Macro Chat Read more

Activity score
82/100
Stars
585
Forks
115
Last commit
50 minutes ago
Repository age
9 months
Version
v2026.7.23.0
License
AGPL-3.0
Repository
macro-inc/macro

Detailed Comparison

Fluxer appears to have several advantages over Macro Chat, particularly in popularity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Fluxer wins

Community & Popularity

Fluxer significantly outpaces Macro Chat in community adoption with 9,783 stars compared to 585 stars on GitHub. This 16.7x difference suggests Fluxer has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Fluxer has 657 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Fluxer last updated 2 hours ago and Macro Chat 50 minutes ago.

Comparable

Project Maturity

Both projects started around the same time, with Fluxer beginning 7 months ago and Macro Chat 9 months ago.

Comparable

Licensing

Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging. However, they also have distinct specializations: Fluxer also focuses on Encrypted Communication.

Fluxer wins

Hosting & Deployment

Fluxer provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Macro Chat may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.