What is the main difference between Fluxer and SAMA?

Fluxer and SAMA are both encrypted communication tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Fluxer or SAMA?

The choice between Fluxer and SAMA depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Fluxer to SAMA?

Migration between Fluxer and SAMA is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Openlane – Open-source, developer-first platform for automated compliance, risk management, and built-in Trust Center.

Learn more

Fluxer vs SAMA

Learn how Fluxer and SAMA differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these encrypted communication tools is best for you.

Fluxer

Free, open-source instant messaging and VoIP platform with full Markdown support, voice/video calls, moderation tools, and self-hosting options for communities.

Visit Fluxer Read more

10,816stars+283(+2.7%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
11 hours ago
Repository age
10 months
Version
2026.1108.42846
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
fluxerapp/fluxer

SAMA

Open source chat server with end-to-end encryption, clustering support, and comprehensive messaging features for building real-time communication apps

Visit SAMA Read more

161stars+3(+1.9%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
1 month ago
Repository age
4 years
Version
0.37.2
License
GPL-3.0
Repository
sama-server

Detailed Comparison

Fluxer appears to have several advantages over SAMA, particularly in popularity, growth, activity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Fluxer wins

Community & Popularity

Fluxer significantly outpaces SAMA in community adoption with 10,816 stars compared to 161 stars on GitHub. This 67.2x difference suggests Fluxer has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Fluxer has 857 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Fluxer wins

Growth Momentum

Fluxer is growing faster, adding 283 stars in the last 30 days (+2.7%) against adding 3 stars for SAMA (+1.9%). Fluxer is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Fluxer wins

Development Activity

Fluxer shows more recent development activity with its last commit 11 hours ago, while SAMA was last updated 1 month ago. This suggests Fluxer is being more actively maintained.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Fluxer uses CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, Golang, Rust, Ruby.

SAMA wins

Project Maturity

SAMA has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to Fluxer which began 10 months ago. This 3.3-year head start suggests SAMA may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

The projects use different licenses: Fluxer is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while SAMA uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Encrypted Communication. However, they also have distinct specializations: Fluxer also focuses on Team Chat & Messaging while SAMA extends into Live Chat & Messaging, WebSockets Servers.

Fluxer wins

Hosting & Deployment

Fluxer provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while SAMA may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.