Learn how SAMA and Wire differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these encrypted communication tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Repository

Both SAMA and Wire have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Wire significantly outpaces SAMA in community adoption with 2,543 stars compared to 158 stars on GitHub. This 16.1x difference suggests Wire has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Wire has 179 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
SAMA and Wire are moving at much the same rate, adding 0 stars and adding 3 stars respectively over the last 30 days (0% vs +0.1%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
SAMA shows more recent development activity with its last commit 5 days ago, while Wire was last updated 8 months ago. This suggests SAMA is being more actively maintained.
Wire has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to SAMA which began 4 years ago. This 6.6-year head start suggests Wire may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the GPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Encrypted Communication. However, they also have distinct specializations: SAMA also focuses on Live Chat & Messaging, WebSockets Servers while Wire extends into Team Chat & Messaging, Video Conferencing & Virtual Office.