Learn how SAMA and Wire differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these encrypted communication tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
26 days agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
0.37.2License
GPL-3.0Repository
sama-server
Last 30 days
Last commit
10 months agoRepository age
11 yearsLicense
GPL-3.0Repository
wireapp/wire
Both SAMA and Wire have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Wire significantly outpaces SAMA in community adoption with 2,556 stars compared to 161 stars on GitHub. This 15.9x difference suggests Wire has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Wire has 180 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
SAMA is growing faster, adding 3 stars in the last 30 days (+1.9%) against adding 6 stars for Wire (+0.2%). SAMA is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
SAMA shows more recent development activity with its last commit 26 days ago, while Wire was last updated 10 months ago. This suggests SAMA is being more actively maintained.
Wire has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to SAMA which began 4 years ago. This 6.6-year head start suggests Wire may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the GPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Encrypted Communication. However, they also have distinct specializations: SAMA also focuses on Live Chat & Messaging, WebSockets Servers while Wire extends into Team Chat & Messaging, Video Conferencing & Virtual Office.