What is the main difference between Element and SAMA?

Element and SAMA are both encrypted communication tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Element or SAMA?

The choice between Element and SAMA depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Element to SAMA?

Migration between Element and SAMA is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Openlane – Open-source, developer-first platform for automated compliance, risk management, and built-in Trust Center.

Learn more

Element vs SAMA

Learn how Element and SAMA differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these encrypted communication tools is best for you.

Element

Open-source platform for encrypted communication, file sharing, and collaboration based on the Matrix protocol.

Visit Element Read more

13,640stars+90(+0.7%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
2 days ago
Repository age
11 years
Version
v1.12.33
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
element-web

SAMA

Open source chat server with end-to-end encryption, clustering support, and comprehensive messaging features for building real-time communication apps

Visit SAMA Read more

161stars+3(+1.9%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
1 month ago
Repository age
4 years
Version
0.37.2
License
GPL-3.0
Repository
sama-server

Detailed Comparison

Element appears to have several advantages over SAMA, particularly in popularity, activity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Element wins

Community & Popularity

Element significantly outpaces SAMA in community adoption with 13,640 stars compared to 161 stars on GitHub. This 84.7x difference suggests Element has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Element has 2,817 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

SAMA wins

Growth Momentum

SAMA is growing faster, adding 3 stars in the last 30 days (+1.9%) against adding 90 stars for Element (+0.7%). SAMA is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Element wins

Development Activity

Element shows more recent development activity with its last commit 2 days ago, while SAMA was last updated 1 month ago. This suggests Element is being more actively maintained.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Element uses CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, Perl.

Element wins

Project Maturity

Element has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to SAMA which began 4 years ago. This 7.3-year head start suggests Element may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

The projects use different licenses: Element is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while SAMA uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Encrypted Communication. However, they also have distinct specializations: Element also focuses on Team Chat & Messaging while SAMA extends into Live Chat & Messaging, WebSockets Servers.

Element wins

Hosting & Deployment

Element provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while SAMA may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.