What is the main difference between Element and SAMA?

Element and SAMA are both encrypted communication tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Element or SAMA?

The choice between Element and SAMA depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Element to SAMA?

Migration between Element and SAMA is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Sent – A unified API for sending messages across SMS, RCS, and apps like WhatsApp.

Learn More

Learn more

Element vs SAMA

Learn how Element and SAMA differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these encrypted communication tools is best for you.

Element

Open-source platform for encrypted communication, file sharing, and collaboration based on the Matrix protocol.

Visit Element Read more

Stars
12,993
Forks
2,567
Last commit
17 hours ago
Repository age
11 years
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes

View Repository

Auto-fetched 9 hours ago.

SAMA

Open source chat server with end-to-end encryption, clustering support, and comprehensive messaging features for building real-time communication apps

Visit SAMA Read more

Stars
152
Forks
11
Last commit
2 days ago
Repository age
4 years
License
GPL-3.0

View Repository

Auto-fetched 9 hours ago.

Detailed Comparison

Element appears to have several advantages over SAMA, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Element wins

Community & Popularity

Element significantly outpaces SAMA in community adoption with 12,993 stars compared to 152 stars on GitHub. This 85.5x difference suggests Element has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Element has 2,567 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Element last updated 17 hours ago and SAMA 2 days ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Element uses CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, Perl.

Element wins

Project Maturity

Element has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to SAMA which began 4 years ago. This 7.3-year head start suggests Element may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

The projects use different licenses: Element is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while SAMA uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Encrypted Communication. However, they also have distinct specializations: Element also focuses on Team Chat & Messaging while SAMA extends into Live Chat & Messaging, WebSockets Servers.

Element wins

Hosting & Deployment

Element provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while SAMA may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.