Learn how Element and Mattermost differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Both Element and Mattermost have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Mattermost leads in popularity with 36,224 stars vs 12,993 stars for Element. The 179% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Mattermost has 8,531 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Element last updated 17 hours ago and Mattermost 9 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Element uses Python, Perl while Mattermost leverages SCSS, Golang.
Both projects started around the same time, with Element beginning 11 years ago and Mattermost 11 years ago.
Element is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Mattermost's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging, Encrypted Communication. However, they also have distinct specializations: Mattermost extends into Collaborative Workspaces.
Both Element and Mattermost offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs