Learn how Element and Mattermost differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Element and Mattermost have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Mattermost leads in popularity with 39,018 stars vs 13,441 stars for Element. The 190% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Mattermost has 8,976 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Element and Mattermost are moving at much the same rate, adding 85 stars and adding 303 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.6% vs +0.8%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Element last updated 12 hours ago and Mattermost 12 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Element uses Python, Perl while Mattermost leverages SCSS, Golang.
Both projects started around the same time, with Element beginning 11 years ago and Mattermost 11 years ago.
Element is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Mattermost's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging, Encrypted Communication. However, they also have distinct specializations: Mattermost extends into Collaborative Workspaces.
Both Element and Mattermost offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs