Learn how Element and Hazel differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 days agoRepository age
11 yearsVersion
v1.12.32License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
element-web
Last 30 days
Last commit
11 days agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v1.0.2License
FSL-1.1-ALv2Self-hosted
YesRepository
mapletechlabs/hazel
Element appears to have several advantages over Hazel, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Element significantly outpaces Hazel in community adoption with 13,614 stars compared to 729 stars on GitHub. This 18.7x difference suggests Element has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Element has 2,804 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Element and Hazel are moving at much the same rate, adding 103 stars and adding 5 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.8% vs +0.7%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Element last updated 3 days ago and Hazel 11 days ago.
Element has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Hazel which began 2 years ago. This 9.9-year head start suggests Element may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Element is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while Hazel uses FSL-1.1-ALv2. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging. However, they also have distinct specializations: Element also focuses on Encrypted Communication.
Both Element and Hazel offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs