What is the main difference between Hazel and Quiet?

Hazel and Quiet are both team chat & messaging tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Hazel or Quiet?

The choice between Hazel and Quiet depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Hazel to Quiet?

Migration between Hazel and Quiet is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Stellar Hosted – Managed Open Source software hosting in the EU: secure, compliant, fast.

Learn more

Hazel vs Quiet

Learn how Hazel and Quiet differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.

Hazel

Team chat for developers with threads, full-text search, keyboard-first navigation, GitHub and Linear previews, desktop apps, and message sync with Slack and Discord.

Visit Hazel Read more

738stars+12(+1.7%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
6 hours ago
Repository age
2 years
Version
v1.1.3
License
FSL-1.1-ALv2
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
mapletechlabs/hazel

Quiet

Quiet is a peer-to-peer messaging app that syncs messages directly between devices over Tor, with no central server, no phone number required, and no metadata leaks.

Visit Quiet Read more

2,662stars+3(+0.1%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
14 days ago
Repository age
5 years
Version
11.3.1
License
GPL-3.0
Repository
tryquiet/quiet

Detailed Comparison

Both Hazel and Quiet have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Quiet wins

Community & Popularity

Quiet significantly outpaces Hazel in community adoption with 2,662 stars compared to 738 stars on GitHub. This 3.6x difference suggests Quiet has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Quiet has 152 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Hazel wins

Growth Momentum

Hazel is growing faster, adding 12 stars in the last 30 days (+1.7%) against adding 3 stars for Quiet (+0.1%). Hazel is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Hazel last updated 6 hours ago and Quiet 14 days ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Kotlin. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hazel uses CSS, Rust, Tauri, Tanstack Start while Quiet leverages Python, C, Objective-C, Java, Swift, C++, Ruby, MATLAB, NestJS.

Quiet wins

Project Maturity

Quiet has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Hazel which began 2 years ago. This 3.4-year head start suggests Quiet may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

The projects use different licenses: Hazel is licensed under FSL-1.1-ALv2 while Quiet uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging. However, they also have distinct specializations: Quiet extends into Encrypted Communication.

Hazel wins

Hosting & Deployment

Hazel provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Quiet may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.