Learn how Hazel and Twake Chat differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
11 days agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v1.0.2License
FSL-1.1-ALv2Self-hosted
YesRepository
mapletechlabs/hazel
Last 30 days
Last commit
6 hours agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
v2.25.2License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
twake-on-matrix
Both Hazel and Twake Chat have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Hazel significantly outpaces Twake Chat in community adoption with 729 stars compared to 172 stars on GitHub. This 4.2x difference suggests Hazel has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Hazel has 58 forks, indicating growing developer engagement.
Twake Chat is growing faster, adding 6 stars in the last 30 days (+3.6%) against adding 5 stars for Hazel (+0.7%). Twake Chat is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Hazel last updated 11 days ago and Twake Chat 6 hours ago.
Twake Chat has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to Hazel which began 2 years ago. This 2.2-year head start suggests Twake Chat may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Hazel is licensed under FSL-1.1-ALv2 while Twake Chat uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging. However, they also have distinct specializations: Twake Chat extends into Video Conferencing & Virtual Office.
Both Hazel and Twake Chat offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs