What is the main difference between Fluxer and Hazel?

Fluxer and Hazel are both team chat & messaging tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Fluxer or Hazel?

The choice between Fluxer and Hazel depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Fluxer to Hazel?

Migration between Fluxer and Hazel is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Stellar Hosted – Managed Open Source software hosting in the EU: secure, compliant, fast.

Learn more

Fluxer vs Hazel

Learn how Fluxer and Hazel differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.

Fluxer

Free, open-source instant messaging and VoIP platform with full Markdown support, voice/video calls, moderation tools, and self-hosting options for communities.

Visit Fluxer Read more

10,893stars+288(+2.7%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
4 hours ago
Repository age
11 months
Version
2026.1114.195738
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
fluxerapp/fluxer

Hazel

Team chat for developers with threads, full-text search, keyboard-first navigation, GitHub and Linear previews, desktop apps, and message sync with Slack and Discord.

Visit Hazel Read more

738stars+12(+1.7%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
6 hours ago
Repository age
2 years
Version
v1.1.3
License
FSL-1.1-ALv2
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
mapletechlabs/hazel

Detailed Comparison

Fluxer appears to have several advantages over Hazel, particularly in popularity and growth. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Fluxer wins

Community & Popularity

Fluxer significantly outpaces Hazel in community adoption with 10,893 stars compared to 738 stars on GitHub. This 14.8x difference suggests Fluxer has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Fluxer has 863 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Fluxer wins

Growth Momentum

Fluxer is growing faster, adding 288 stars in the last 30 days (+2.7%) against adding 12 stars for Hazel (+1.7%). Fluxer is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Fluxer last updated 4 hours ago and Hazel 6 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Rust. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Fluxer uses Python, Golang, Ruby while Hazel leverages Kotlin, Tauri, Tanstack Start.

Comparable

Project Maturity

Both projects started around the same time, with Fluxer beginning 11 months ago and Hazel 2 years ago.

Comparable

Licensing

The projects use different licenses: Fluxer is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while Hazel uses FSL-1.1-ALv2. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging. However, they also have distinct specializations: Fluxer also focuses on Encrypted Communication.

Comparable