What is the main difference between Hazel and Stoat?

Hazel and Stoat are both team chat & messaging tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Hazel or Stoat?

The choice between Hazel and Stoat depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Hazel to Stoat?

Migration between Hazel and Stoat is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Stellar Hosted – Managed Open Source software hosting in the EU: secure, compliant, fast.

Learn more

Hazel vs Stoat

Learn how Hazel and Stoat differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.

Hazel

Team chat for developers with threads, full-text search, keyboard-first navigation, GitHub and Linear previews, desktop apps, and message sync with Slack and Discord.

Visit Hazel Read more

729stars+5(+0.7%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
11 days ago
Repository age
2 years
Version
v1.0.2
License
FSL-1.1-ALv2
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
mapletechlabs/hazel

Stoat

Self-hostable group chat with servers, channels, voice, and moderation tools. No ads, no data mining, built under EU privacy law.

Visit Stoat Read more

3,421stars+68(+2%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
2 days ago
Repository age
5 years
Version
v0.16.2
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
stoatchat/stoatchat

Detailed Comparison

Stoat appears to have several advantages over Hazel, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Stoat wins

Community & Popularity

Stoat significantly outpaces Hazel in community adoption with 3,421 stars compared to 729 stars on GitHub. This 4.7x difference suggests Stoat has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Stoat has 408 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Stoat wins

Growth Momentum

Stoat is growing faster, adding 68 stars in the last 30 days (+2%) against adding 5 stars for Hazel (+0.7%). Stoat is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Hazel last updated 11 days ago and Stoat 2 days ago.

Stoat wins

Project Maturity

Stoat has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Hazel which began 2 years ago. This 3.9-year head start suggests Stoat may have more mature features and established processes.

Hazel wins

Licensing

Hazel is licensed under FSL-1.1-ALv2, while Stoat's license terms are not publicly specified.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging. However, they also have distinct specializations: Stoat extends into Encrypted Communication.

Comparable