What is the main difference between Rocket.Chat and Stoat?

Rocket.Chat and Stoat are both team chat & messaging tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Rocket.Chat or Stoat?

The choice between Rocket.Chat and Stoat depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Rocket.Chat to Stoat?

Migration between Rocket.Chat and Stoat is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

InfluxDB – The purpose-built time series platform for high-velocity ingestion and real-time queries at scale.

Learn more

Rocket.Chat vs Stoat

Learn how Rocket.Chat and Stoat differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.

Rocket.Chat

Open source communication platform combining messaging, voice, video, and AI for organizations that need full data control, air-gapped deployments, and zero-trust security.

Visit Rocket.Chat Read more

46,320stars+144(+0.3%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
14 hours ago
Repository age
11 years
Version
8.9.0
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
rocket.chat

Stoat

Self-hostable group chat with servers, channels, voice, and moderation tools. No ads, no data mining, built under EU privacy law.

Visit Stoat Read more

3,420stars+68(+2%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
1 day ago
Repository age
5 years
Version
v0.16.2
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
stoatchat/stoatchat

Detailed Comparison

Rocket.Chat appears to have several advantages over Stoat, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Rocket.Chat wins

Community & Popularity

Rocket.Chat significantly outpaces Stoat in community adoption with 46,320 stars compared to 3,420 stars on GitHub. This 13.5x difference suggests Rocket.Chat has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Rocket.Chat has 14,034 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Stoat wins

Growth Momentum

Stoat is growing faster, adding 68 stars in the last 30 days (+2%) against adding 144 stars for Rocket.Chat (+0.3%). Stoat is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Rocket.Chat last updated 14 hours ago and Stoat 1 day ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Rocket.Chat uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, SCSS, Meteor while Stoat leverages Python, Rust.

Rocket.Chat wins

Project Maturity

Rocket.Chat has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Stoat which began 5 years ago. This 6.2-year head start suggests Rocket.Chat may have more mature features and established processes.

Rocket.Chat wins

Licensing

Rocket.Chat is licensed under MIT, while Stoat's license terms are not publicly specified.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging. However, they also have distinct specializations: Rocket.Chat also focuses on Collaborative Workspaces, Video Conferencing & Virtual Office while Stoat extends into Encrypted Communication.

Comparable