Learn how Buzz and Rocket.Chat differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Rocket.Chat appears to have several advantages over Buzz, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Rocket.Chat significantly outpaces Buzz in community adoption with 45,853 stars compared to 6,159 stars on GitHub. This 7.4x difference suggests Rocket.Chat has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Rocket.Chat has 13,742 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Buzz last updated 47 minutes ago and Rocket.Chat 47 minutes ago.
Rocket.Chat has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Buzz which began 5 months ago. This 11.0-year head start suggests Rocket.Chat may have more mature features and established processes.
Buzz is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Rocket.Chat's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging. However, they also have distinct specializations: Rocket.Chat extends into Collaborative Workspaces, Video Conferencing & Virtual Office.
Rocket.Chat provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Buzz may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs