What is the main difference between Campfire and Rocket.Chat?

Campfire and Rocket.Chat are both team chat & messaging tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Campfire or Rocket.Chat?

The choice between Campfire and Rocket.Chat depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Campfire to Rocket.Chat?

Migration between Campfire and Rocket.Chat is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Docmost – Open-source wiki software with real-time collaboration, diagrams, AI, SSO, RBAC permissions and more.

Learn More

Campfire vs Rocket.Chat

Learn how Campfire and Rocket.Chat differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.

Campfire

Install your own group chat system with @mentions, DMs, and mobile support. One-time purchase, no monthly fees. Includes full source code for customization.

Visit Campfire Read more

4,515stars+74(+1.7%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
8 hours ago
Repository age
1 year
Version
v1.4.9
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
basecamp/once-campfire

Rocket.Chat

Open source communication platform combining messaging, voice, video, and AI for organizations that need full data control, air-gapped deployments, and zero-trust security.

Visit Rocket.Chat Read more

46,022stars+150(+0.3%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
2 days ago
Repository age
11 years
Version
8.7.1
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
rocketchat/rocket.chat

Detailed Comparison

Both Campfire and Rocket.Chat have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Rocket.Chat wins

Community & Popularity

Rocket.Chat significantly outpaces Campfire in community adoption with 46,022 stars compared to 4,515 stars on GitHub. This 10.2x difference suggests Rocket.Chat has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Rocket.Chat has 13,818 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Campfire wins

Growth Momentum

Campfire is growing faster, adding 74 stars in the last 30 days (+1.7%) against adding 150 stars for Rocket.Chat (+0.3%). Campfire is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Campfire last updated 8 hours ago and Rocket.Chat 2 days ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Campfire uses Ruby while Rocket.Chat leverages Bash, Typescript, JSX, SCSS, Meteor.

Rocket.Chat wins

Project Maturity

Rocket.Chat has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Campfire which began 1 year ago. This 10.4-year head start suggests Rocket.Chat may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging. However, they also have distinct specializations: Rocket.Chat extends into Collaborative Workspaces, Video Conferencing & Virtual Office.

Comparable