What is the main difference between Campfire and Stoat?

Campfire and Stoat are both team chat & messaging tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Campfire or Stoat?

The choice between Campfire and Stoat depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Campfire to Stoat?

Migration between Campfire and Stoat is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Sent – Messaging Infrastructure for Developers. One API for SMS, WhatsApp, and RCS across 190+ countries.

Learn More

Campfire vs Stoat

Learn how Campfire and Stoat differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.

Campfire

Install your own group chat system with @mentions, DMs, and mobile support. One-time purchase, no monthly fees. Includes full source code for customization.

Visit Campfire Read more

4,621stars+138(+3.1%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
2 days ago
Repository age
1 year
Version
v1.4.9
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
basecamp/once-campfire

Stoat

Self-hostable group chat with servers, channels, voice, and moderation tools. No ads, no data mining, built under EU privacy law.

Visit Stoat Read more

3,317stars+98(+3%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
10 hours ago
Repository age
5 years
Version
v0.15.5
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
stoatchat/stoatchat

Sponsor Stoat onko-fi.com

Detailed Comparison

Both Campfire and Stoat have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Comparable

Community & Popularity

Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Campfire having 4,621 stars and Stoat having 3,317 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Campfire has 791 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Comparable

Growth Momentum

Campfire and Stoat are moving at much the same rate, adding 138 stars and adding 98 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+3.1% vs +3%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Campfire last updated 2 days ago and Stoat 10 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Campfire uses JavaScript, CSS, Ruby while Stoat leverages Bash, Python, Rust.

Stoat wins

Project Maturity

Stoat has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Campfire which began 1 year ago. This 4.2-year head start suggests Stoat may have more mature features and established processes.

Campfire wins

Licensing

Campfire is licensed under MIT, while Stoat's license terms are not publicly specified.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging. However, they also have distinct specializations: Stoat extends into Encrypted Communication.

Comparable