Learn how Campfire and Stoat differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
4 hours agoRepository age
1 yearVersion
v1.5.10License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
once-campfire
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
5 yearsVersion
v0.16.4Self-hosted
YesRepository
stoatchat/stoatchat
Both Campfire and Stoat have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Campfire having 4,835 stars and Stoat having 3,468 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Campfire has 829 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Stoat is growing faster, adding 71 stars in the last 30 days (+2.1%) against adding 48 stars for Campfire (+1%). Stoat is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Campfire last updated 4 hours ago and Stoat 1 day ago.
Campfire uses JavaScript, CSS, Ruby while Stoat leverages Bash, Python, Rust.
Stoat has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Campfire which began 1 year ago. This 4.2-year head start suggests Stoat may have more mature features and established processes.
Campfire is licensed under MIT, while Stoat's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging. However, they also have distinct specializations: Stoat extends into Encrypted Communication.
Both Campfire and Stoat offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs