What is the main difference between Campfire and Element?

Campfire and Element are both team chat & messaging tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Campfire or Element?

The choice between Campfire and Element depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Campfire to Element?

Migration between Campfire and Element is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Docmost – Open-source wiki software with real-time collaboration, diagrams, AI, SSO, RBAC permissions and more.

Learn More

Campfire vs Element

Learn how Campfire and Element differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.

Campfire

Install your own group chat system with @mentions, DMs, and mobile support. One-time purchase, no monthly fees. Includes full source code for customization.

Visit Campfire Read more

4,515stars+74(+1.7%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
8 hours ago
Repository age
1 year
Version
v1.4.9
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
basecamp/once-campfire

Element

Open-source platform for encrypted communication, file sharing, and collaboration based on the Matrix protocol.

Visit Element Read more

13,403stars+84(+0.6%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
17 hours ago
Repository age
11 years
Version
v1.12.26
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
element-hq/element-web

Sponsor Element onpatreon.com

Detailed Comparison

Both Campfire and Element have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Element wins

Community & Popularity

Element leads in popularity with 13,403 stars vs 4,515 stars for Campfire. The 197% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Element has 2,737 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Campfire wins

Growth Momentum

Campfire is growing faster, adding 74 stars in the last 30 days (+1.7%) against adding 84 stars for Element (+0.6%). Campfire is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Campfire last updated 8 hours ago and Element 17 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Campfire uses Ruby while Element leverages Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, Perl.

Element wins

Project Maturity

Element has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Campfire which began 1 year ago. This 10.2-year head start suggests Element may have more mature features and established processes.

Campfire wins

Licensing

Campfire uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Element's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging. However, they also have distinct specializations: Element extends into Encrypted Communication.

Comparable