Learn how Element and Wire differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
11 hours agoRepository age
11 yearsVersion
v1.12.33License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
element-web
Last 30 days
Last commit
10 months agoRepository age
11 yearsLicense
GPL-3.0Repository
wireapp/wire
Element appears to have several advantages over Wire, particularly in popularity, growth, activity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Element significantly outpaces Wire in community adoption with 13,636 stars compared to 2,556 stars on GitHub. This 5.3x difference suggests Element has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Element has 2,814 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Element is growing faster, adding 103 stars in the last 30 days (+0.8%) against adding 6 stars for Wire (+0.2%). Element is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Element shows more recent development activity with its last commit 11 hours ago, while Wire was last updated 10 months ago. This suggests Element is being more actively maintained.
Both projects started around the same time, with Element beginning 11 years ago and Wire 11 years ago.
The projects use different licenses: Element is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while Wire uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging, Encrypted Communication. However, they also have distinct specializations: Wire extends into Video Conferencing & Virtual Office.
Element provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Wire may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs