Learn how Hazel and Wire differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
6 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v1.1.3License
FSL-1.1-ALv2Self-hosted
YesRepository
mapletechlabs/hazel
Last 30 days
Last commit
10 months agoRepository age
11 yearsLicense
GPL-3.0Repository
wireapp/wire
Both Hazel and Wire have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Wire significantly outpaces Hazel in community adoption with 2,556 stars compared to 738 stars on GitHub. This 3.5x difference suggests Wire has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Wire has 180 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Hazel is growing faster, adding 12 stars in the last 30 days (+1.7%) against adding 2 stars for Wire (+0.1%). Hazel is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Hazel shows more recent development activity with its last commit 6 hours ago, while Wire was last updated 10 months ago. This suggests Hazel is being more actively maintained.
Wire has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Hazel which began 2 years ago. This 9.2-year head start suggests Wire may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Hazel is licensed under FSL-1.1-ALv2 while Wire uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging. However, they also have distinct specializations: Wire extends into Encrypted Communication, Video Conferencing & Virtual Office.
Hazel provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Wire may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs