Learn how Cinny and Element differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Element appears to have several advantages over Cinny, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Element significantly outpaces Cinny in community adoption with 13,538 stars compared to 3,916 stars on GitHub. This 3.5x difference suggests Element has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Element has 2,784 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Cinny and Element are moving at much the same rate, adding 35 stars and adding 110 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.9% vs +0.8%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Cinny last updated 6 days ago and Element 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Cinny uses SCSS while Element leverages Bash, Python, Perl.
Element has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Cinny which began 5 years ago. This 5.8-year head start suggests Element may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging, Encrypted Communication. However, they also have distinct specializations: Cinny also focuses on Decentralized Social Networks.
Element provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Cinny may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs