Ad
 
Learn more

Element vs Quiet

Learn how Element and Quiet differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.

vs
Favicon of Element

Element

Open-source platform for encrypted communication, file sharing, and collaboration based on the Matrix protocol.
  • Stars


    13,229
  • Forks


    2,665
  • Last commit


    2 days ago
  • Repository age


    11 years
  • License


    AGPL-3.0
  • Self-hosted


    Yes
View Repository
Screenshot of Element
Favicon of Quiet

Quiet

Quiet is a peer-to-peer messaging app that syncs messages directly between devices over Tor, with no central server, no phone number required, and no metadata leaks.
  • Stars


    2,609
  • Forks


    138
  • Last commit


    2 days ago
  • Repository age


    5 years
  • License


    GPL-3.0
View Repository
Screenshot of Quiet

Detailed Comparison

Element appears to have several advantages over Quiet, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Element wins
Community & Popularity

Element significantly outpaces Quiet in community adoption with 13,229 stars compared to 2,609 stars on GitHub. This 5.1x difference suggests Element has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Element has 2,665 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Comparable
Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Element last updated 2 days ago and Quiet 2 days ago.

Comparable
Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Element uses CSS, Perl while Quiet leverages C, Objective-C, Java, C++, Ruby, Swift, Kotlin, MATLAB, NestJS.

Element wins
Project Maturity

Element has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Quiet which began 5 years ago. This 6.5-year head start suggests Element may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable
Licensing

The projects use different licenses: Element is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while Quiet uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging, Encrypted Communication.

Element wins
Hosting & Deployment

Element provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Quiet may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.