What is the main difference between Fluxer and Quiet?

Fluxer and Quiet are both team chat & messaging tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Fluxer or Quiet?

The choice between Fluxer and Quiet depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Fluxer to Quiet?

Migration between Fluxer and Quiet is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Openlane – Open-source, developer-first platform for automated compliance, risk management, and built-in Trust Center.

Learn more

Fluxer vs Quiet

Learn how Fluxer and Quiet differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.

Fluxer

Free, open-source instant messaging and VoIP platform with full Markdown support, voice/video calls, moderation tools, and self-hosting options for communities.

Visit Fluxer Read more

10,893stars+288(+2.7%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
4 hours ago
Repository age
11 months
Version
2026.1114.195738
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
fluxerapp/fluxer

Quiet

Quiet is a peer-to-peer messaging app that syncs messages directly between devices over Tor, with no central server, no phone number required, and no metadata leaks.

Visit Quiet Read more

2,662stars+3(+0.1%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
14 days ago
Repository age
5 years
Version
11.3.1
License
GPL-3.0
Repository
tryquiet/quiet

Detailed Comparison

Fluxer appears to have several advantages over Quiet, particularly in popularity, growth and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Fluxer wins

Community & Popularity

Fluxer significantly outpaces Quiet in community adoption with 10,893 stars compared to 2,662 stars on GitHub. This 4.1x difference suggests Fluxer has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Fluxer has 863 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Fluxer wins

Growth Momentum

Fluxer is growing faster, adding 288 stars in the last 30 days (+2.7%) against adding 3 stars for Quiet (+0.1%). Fluxer is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Fluxer last updated 4 hours ago and Quiet 14 days ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, Ruby. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Fluxer uses CSS, Golang, Rust while Quiet leverages C, Objective-C, Java, Swift, C++, Kotlin, MATLAB, NestJS.

Quiet wins

Project Maturity

Quiet has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Fluxer which began 11 months ago. This 4.1-year head start suggests Quiet may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

The projects use different licenses: Fluxer is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while Quiet uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging, Encrypted Communication.

Fluxer wins

Hosting & Deployment

Fluxer provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Quiet may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.