Ad
 
Learn more

Element vs Fluxer

Learn how Element and Fluxer differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.

vs
Favicon of Element

Element

Open-source platform for encrypted communication, file sharing, and collaboration based on the Matrix protocol.
  • Stars


    13,156
  • Forks


    2,636
  • Last commit


    13 hours ago
  • Repository age


    11 years
  • License


    AGPL-3.0
  • Self-hosted


    Yes
View Repository

Auto-fetched .

Screenshot of Element
Favicon of Fluxer

Fluxer

Free, open-source instant messaging and VoIP platform with full Markdown support, voice/video calls, moderation tools, and self-hosting options for communities.
  • Stars


    8,690
  • Forks


    494
  • Last commit


    2 months ago
  • Repository age


    5 months
  • License


    AGPL-3.0
  • Self-hosted


    Yes
View Repository

Auto-fetched .

Screenshot of Fluxer

Detailed Comparison

Element appears to have several advantages over Fluxer, particularly in popularity, activity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Element wins
Community & Popularity

Element leads in popularity with 13,156 stars vs 8,690 stars for Fluxer. The 51% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Element has 2,636 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Element wins
Development Activity

Element shows more recent development activity with its last commit 13 hours ago, while Fluxer was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests Element is being more actively maintained.

Comparable
Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Element uses Perl while Fluxer leverages Golang, Rust, Ruby.

Element wins
Project Maturity

Element has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Fluxer which began 5 months ago. This 10.6-year head start suggests Element may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable
Licensing

Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging, Encrypted Communication.

Comparable
Hosting & Deployment

Both Element and Fluxer offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.