Learn how Element and Fluxer differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
11 yearsVersion
v1.12.33License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
element-web
Last 30 days
Last commit
11 hours agoRepository age
10 monthsVersion
2026.1108.42846License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
fluxerapp/fluxer
Both Element and Fluxer have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Element having 13,640 stars and Fluxer having 10,816 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Element has 2,817 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Fluxer is growing faster, adding 283 stars in the last 30 days (+2.7%) against adding 90 stars for Element (+0.7%). Fluxer is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Element last updated 2 days ago and Fluxer 11 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Element uses Perl while Fluxer leverages Golang, Rust, Ruby.
Element has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Fluxer which began 10 months ago. This 10.6-year head start suggests Element may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging, Encrypted Communication.
Both Element and Fluxer offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs