Ad
 
Learn more

Element vs Stoat

Learn how Element and Stoat differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.

vs
Favicon of Element

Element

Open-source platform for encrypted communication, file sharing, and collaboration based on the Matrix protocol.
  • Stars


    13,012
  • Forks


    2,568
  • Last commit


    20 hours ago
  • Repository age


    11 years
  • License


    AGPL-3.0
  • Self-hosted


    Yes
View Repository

Auto-fetched .

Screenshot of Element
Favicon of Stoat

Stoat

Modern chat platform featuring text channels, community building tools, fine-grained permissions, and complete privacy protection. Open-source and ad-free.
  • Stars


    2,971
  • Forks


    344
  • Last commit


    3 days ago
  • Repository age


    5 years
View Repository

Auto-fetched .

Screenshot of Stoat

Detailed Comparison

Element appears to have several advantages over Stoat, particularly in popularity, maturity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Element wins
Community & Popularity

Element significantly outpaces Stoat in community adoption with 13,012 stars compared to 2,971 stars on GitHub. This 4.4x difference suggests Element has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Element has 2,568 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Comparable
Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Element last updated 20 hours ago and Stoat 3 days ago.

Comparable
Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Element uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Perl while Stoat leverages Rust.

Element wins
Project Maturity

Element has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Stoat which began 5 years ago. This 6.0-year head start suggests Element may have more mature features and established processes.

Element wins
Licensing

Element is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Stoat's license terms are not publicly specified.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging, Encrypted Communication.

Element wins
Hosting & Deployment

Element provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Stoat may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.