Learn how Element and Stoat differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.
Auto-fetched .


Element appears to have several advantages over Stoat, particularly in popularity, maturity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Element significantly outpaces Stoat in community adoption with 13,012 stars compared to 2,971 stars on GitHub. This 4.4x difference suggests Element has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Element has 2,568 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Element last updated 18 hours ago and Stoat 2 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Element uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Perl while Stoat leverages Rust.
Element has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Stoat which began 5 years ago. This 6.0-year head start suggests Element may have more mature features and established processes.
Element is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Stoat's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging, Encrypted Communication.
Element provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Stoat may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.