What is the main difference between Stoat and Zulip?

Stoat and Zulip are both team chat & messaging tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Stoat or Zulip?

The choice between Stoat and Zulip depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Stoat to Zulip?

Migration between Stoat and Zulip is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Stellar Hosted – Managed Open Source software hosting in the EU: secure, compliant, fast.

Learn More

Stoat vs Zulip

Learn how Stoat and Zulip differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.

Stoat

Self-hostable group chat with servers, channels, voice, and moderation tools. No ads, no data mining, built under EU privacy law.

Visit Stoat Read more

3,270stars+87(+2.7%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
21 hours ago
Repository age
5 years
Version
v0.15.3
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
stoatchat/stoatchat

Sponsor Stoat onko-fi.com

Zulip

Zulip is an open-source team chat app that uses threaded conversations to keep communication organized and efficient for teams of all sizes.

Visit Zulip Read more

25,799stars+208(+0.8%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
12 hours ago
Repository age
11 years
Version
12.2
License
Apache-2.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
zulip/zulip

Sponsor Zulip ongithub.com

Detailed Comparison

Zulip appears to have several advantages over Stoat, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Zulip wins

Community & Popularity

Zulip significantly outpaces Stoat in community adoption with 25,799 stars compared to 3,270 stars on GitHub. This 7.9x difference suggests Zulip has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Zulip has 10,160 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Stoat wins

Growth Momentum

Stoat is growing faster, adding 87 stars in the last 30 days (+2.7%) against adding 208 stars for Zulip (+0.8%). Stoat is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Stoat last updated 21 hours ago and Zulip 12 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Stoat uses Rust while Zulip leverages JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, Ruby.

Zulip wins

Project Maturity

Zulip has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Stoat which began 5 years ago. This 5.8-year head start suggests Zulip may have more mature features and established processes.

Zulip wins

Licensing

Zulip is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Stoat's license terms are not publicly specified.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging. However, they also have distinct specializations: Stoat also focuses on Encrypted Communication.

Comparable