Learn how Mattermost and Zulip differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
13 hours agoRepository age
11 yearsVersion
v12.0.1Self-hosted
YesRepository
mattermost
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
11 yearsVersion
12.3License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
zulip/zulip
Both Mattermost and Zulip have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Mattermost leads in popularity with 39,427 stars vs 26,109 stars for Zulip. The 51% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Zulip has 10,473 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Mattermost and Zulip are moving at much the same rate, adding 238 stars and adding 157 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.6% vs +0.6%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Mattermost last updated 13 hours ago and Zulip 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Mattermost uses JSX, Golang, SCSS while Zulip leverages Python, Ruby.
Both projects started around the same time, with Mattermost beginning 11 years ago and Zulip 11 years ago.
Zulip is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Mattermost's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging. However, they also have distinct specializations: Mattermost also focuses on Collaborative Workspaces, Encrypted Communication.
Both Mattermost and Zulip offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs