Learn how Campfire and Mattermost differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Campfire and Mattermost have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Mattermost significantly outpaces Campfire in community adoption with 38,890 stars compared to 4,515 stars on GitHub. This 8.6x difference suggests Mattermost has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Mattermost has 8,929 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Campfire is growing faster, adding 74 stars in the last 30 days (+1.7%) against adding 332 stars for Mattermost (+0.9%). Campfire is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Campfire last updated 8 hours ago and Mattermost 6 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Campfire uses Ruby while Mattermost leverages Bash, Typescript, JSX, SCSS, Golang.
Mattermost has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Campfire which began 1 year ago. This 10.3-year head start suggests Mattermost may have more mature features and established processes.
Campfire is licensed under MIT, while Mattermost's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging. However, they also have distinct specializations: Mattermost extends into Collaborative Workspaces, Encrypted Communication.
Both Campfire and Mattermost offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs