Learn how Campfire and Mattermost differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these team chat & messaging tools is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Both Campfire and Mattermost have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Mattermost significantly outpaces Campfire in community adoption with 36,358 stars compared to 4,284 stars on GitHub. This 8.5x difference suggests Mattermost has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Mattermost has 8,558 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Campfire last updated 12 days ago and Mattermost 10 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Campfire uses Ruby while Mattermost leverages Bash, Typescript, JSX, SCSS, Golang.
Mattermost has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Campfire which began 8 months ago. This 10.3-year head start suggests Mattermost may have more mature features and established processes.
Campfire is licensed under MIT, while Mattermost's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Team Chat & Messaging. However, they also have distinct specializations: Mattermost extends into Collaborative Workspaces, Encrypted Communication.
Both Campfire and Mattermost offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs