Learn how Quiet and SAMA differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these encrypted communication tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
7 days agoRepository age
5 yearsVersion
11.3.1License
GPL-3.0Repository
tryquiet/quiet
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 month agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
0.37.2License
GPL-3.0Repository
sama-server
Both Quiet and SAMA have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Quiet significantly outpaces SAMA in community adoption with 2,663 stars compared to 161 stars on GitHub. This 16.5x difference suggests Quiet has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Quiet has 151 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
SAMA is growing faster, adding 2 stars in the last 30 days (+1.3%) against adding 4 stars for Quiet (+0.2%). SAMA is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Quiet last updated 7 days ago and SAMA 1 month ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Quiet uses Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, C, Objective-C, Java, Swift, C++, Ruby, Kotlin, MATLAB, NestJS.
Both projects started around the same time, with Quiet beginning 5 years ago and SAMA 4 years ago.
Both projects use the GPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Encrypted Communication. However, they also have distinct specializations: Quiet also focuses on Team Chat & Messaging while SAMA extends into Live Chat & Messaging, WebSockets Servers.