Learn how Quiet and SAMA differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these encrypted communication tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Quiet appears to have several advantages over SAMA, particularly in popularity and growth. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Quiet significantly outpaces SAMA in community adoption with 2,638 stars compared to 158 stars on GitHub. This 16.7x difference suggests Quiet has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Quiet has 145 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Quiet is growing faster, adding 17 stars in the last 30 days (+0.6%) against adding 0 stars for SAMA (0%). Quiet is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Quiet last updated 2 days ago and SAMA 20 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Quiet uses Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, C, Objective-C, Java, Swift, C++, Ruby, Kotlin, MATLAB, NestJS.
Both projects started around the same time, with Quiet beginning 5 years ago and SAMA 4 years ago.
Both projects use the GPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Encrypted Communication. However, they also have distinct specializations: Quiet also focuses on Team Chat & Messaging while SAMA extends into Live Chat & Messaging, WebSockets Servers.