What is the main difference between Tianji and Uptime Kuma?

Tianji and Uptime Kuma are both uptime monitoring tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Tianji or Uptime Kuma?

The choice between Tianji and Uptime Kuma depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Tianji to Uptime Kuma?

Migration between Tianji and Uptime Kuma is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Docmost – Open-source wiki software with real-time collaboration, diagrams, AI, SSO, RBAC permissions and more.

Learn More

Tianji vs Uptime Kuma

Learn how Tianji and Uptime Kuma differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these uptime monitoring tools is best for you.

Tianji

Self-hostable platform combining website analytics, uptime monitoring, server status, Docker tracking, status pages, and telemetry for indie developers and small teams.

Visit Tianji Read more

3,085stars+8(+0.3%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
5 days ago
Repository age
3 years
Version
v1.32.25
License
Apache-2.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
msgbyte/tianji

Uptime Kuma

Monitors websites, APIs, and services with real-time alerts, a status page, and support for dozens of notification channels. Self-hosted and Docker-friendly.

Visit Uptime Kuma Read more

90,642stars+1,101(+1.2%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
15 hours ago
Repository age
5 years
Version
2.5.3
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
louislam/uptime-kuma

Sponsor Uptime Kuma ongithub.com

Detailed Comparison

Uptime Kuma appears to have several advantages over Tianji, particularly in popularity, growth, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Uptime Kuma wins

Community & Popularity

Uptime Kuma significantly outpaces Tianji in community adoption with 90,642 stars compared to 3,085 stars on GitHub. This 29.4x difference suggests Uptime Kuma has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Uptime Kuma has 8,297 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Uptime Kuma wins

Growth Momentum

Uptime Kuma is growing faster, adding 1,101 stars in the last 30 days (+1.2%) against adding 8 stars for Tianji (+0.3%). Uptime Kuma is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Tianji last updated 5 days ago and Uptime Kuma 15 hours ago.

Uptime Kuma wins

Project Maturity

Uptime Kuma has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Tianji which began 3 years ago. This 2.2-year head start suggests Uptime Kuma may have more mature features and established processes.

Uptime Kuma wins

Licensing

Uptime Kuma uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Tianji's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Uptime Monitoring, Status Pages. However, they also have distinct specializations: Tianji also focuses on Web Analytics while Uptime Kuma extends into Infrastructure Monitoring.

Comparable