Learn how Countly and Open Analytics differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
7 hours agoRepository age
14 yearsVersion
25.03.57-LTSLicense
OtherSelf-hosted
YesRepository
countly-server
Last 30 days
Last commit
4 days agoRepository age
3 monthsVersion
v0.8.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
openanalytics
Both Countly and Open Analytics have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Countly significantly outpaces Open Analytics in community adoption with 5,922 stars compared to 642 stars on GitHub. This 9.2x difference suggests Countly has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Countly has 983 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Open Analytics is growing faster, adding 52 stars in the last 30 days (+8.8%) against adding 15 stars for Countly (+0.3%). Open Analytics is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Countly last updated 7 hours ago and Open Analytics 4 days ago.
Countly has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Open Analytics which began 3 months ago. This 14.4-year head start suggests Countly may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Countly is licensed under Other while Open Analytics uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: Countly also focuses on Product Analytics.
Both Countly and Open Analytics offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs