Learn how Open Analytics and Tianji differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
4 days agoRepository age
3 monthsVersion
v0.8.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
openanalytics
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 days agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v1.33.12License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
msgbyte/tianji
Both Open Analytics and Tianji have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Tianji significantly outpaces Open Analytics in community adoption with 3,121 stars compared to 642 stars on GitHub. This 4.9x difference suggests Tianji has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Tianji has 198 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Open Analytics is growing faster, adding 52 stars in the last 30 days (+8.8%) against adding 21 stars for Tianji (+0.7%). Open Analytics is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Open Analytics last updated 4 days ago and Tianji 3 days ago.
Tianji has been in development longer, starting 3 years ago, compared to Open Analytics which began 3 months ago. This 3.0-year head start suggests Tianji may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Open Analytics is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while Tianji uses Apache-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: Tianji extends into Uptime Monitoring, Status Pages.
Both Open Analytics and Tianji offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs