Learn how Matomo and Open Analytics differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
16 yearsVersion
5.14.2License
GPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
matomo-org/matomo
Last 30 days
Last commit
4 days agoRepository age
3 monthsVersion
v0.8.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
openanalytics
Both Matomo and Open Analytics have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Matomo significantly outpaces Open Analytics in community adoption with 21,982 stars compared to 642 stars on GitHub. This 34.2x difference suggests Matomo has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Matomo has 2,922 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Open Analytics is growing faster, adding 52 stars in the last 30 days (+8.8%) against adding 83 stars for Matomo (+0.4%). Open Analytics is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Matomo last updated 1 day ago and Open Analytics 4 days ago.
Matomo has been in development longer, starting 16 years ago, compared to Open Analytics which began 3 months ago. This 15.6-year head start suggests Matomo may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Matomo is licensed under GPL-3.0 while Open Analytics uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics.
Both Matomo and Open Analytics offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs