Learn how Open Analytics and Rybbit differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
4 days agoRepository age
3 monthsVersion
v0.8.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
openanalytics
Last 30 days
Last commit
14 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v2.9.2License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
rybbit-io/rybbit
Both Open Analytics and Rybbit have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Rybbit significantly outpaces Open Analytics in community adoption with 13,159 stars compared to 642 stars on GitHub. This 20.5x difference suggests Rybbit has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Rybbit has 761 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Open Analytics is growing faster, adding 52 stars in the last 30 days (+8.8%) against adding 93 stars for Rybbit (+0.7%). Open Analytics is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Open Analytics last updated 4 days ago and Rybbit 14 hours ago.
Rybbit has been in development longer, starting 2 years ago, compared to Open Analytics which began 3 months ago. This 1.6-year head start suggests Rybbit may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: Rybbit extends into Product Analytics.
Both Open Analytics and Rybbit offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs