Fathom Lite vs Open Analytics

Fathom Lite significantly outpaces Open Analytics in community adoption with 8,032 stars compared to 642 stars on GitHub. This 12.5x difference suggests Fathom Lite has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Fathom Lite has 389 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Open Analytics is growing faster, adding 52 stars in the last 30 days (+8.8%) against adding 11 stars for Fathom Lite (+0.1%). Open Analytics is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Open Analytics shows more recent development activity with its last commit 4 days ago, while Fathom Lite was last updated 7 months ago. This suggests Open Analytics is being more actively maintained.

Fathom Lite has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Open Analytics which began 3 months ago. This 9.9-year head start suggests Fathom Lite may have more mature features and established processes.

Fathom Lite uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Open Analytics's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics.

Open Analytics provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Fathom Lite may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.