Learn how Open Analytics and Umami differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
4 days agoRepository age
3 monthsVersion
v0.8.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
openanalytics
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 days agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
v3.4.1License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
umami-software/umami
Umami appears to have several advantages over Open Analytics, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Umami significantly outpaces Open Analytics in community adoption with 39,689 stars compared to 642 stars on GitHub. This 61.8x difference suggests Umami has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Umami has 8,412 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Open Analytics is growing faster, adding 52 stars in the last 30 days (+8.8%) against adding 661 stars for Umami (+1.7%). Open Analytics is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Open Analytics last updated 4 days ago and Umami 3 days ago.
Umami has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Open Analytics which began 3 months ago. This 6.2-year head start suggests Umami may have more mature features and established processes.
Umami uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Open Analytics's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics.
Both Open Analytics and Umami offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs