Ad
Learn more

HitKeep vs Open Analytics

Learn how HitKeep and Open Analytics differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.

vs

HitKeep

Self-hosted or managed web analytics with zero external dependencies. Cookie-free tracking, full data sovereignty, and single binary deployment for organizations that own their data.
100stars

Last 30 days

Screenshot of HitKeep

Open Analytics

Privacy-first web analytics with realtime visitors, funnels, web vitals and revenue attribution from one small cookieless script. No consent banner needed.
642stars+52(+8.8%)

Last 30 days

Screenshot of Open Analytics

Detailed Comparison

Both HitKeep and Open Analytics have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Open Analytics wins
Community & Popularity

Open Analytics significantly outpaces HitKeep in community adoption with 642 stars compared to 100 stars on GitHub. This 6.4x difference suggests Open Analytics has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Open Analytics has 53 forks, indicating growing developer engagement.

Comparable
Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with HitKeep last updated 21 hours ago and Open Analytics 4 days ago.

Comparable
Project Maturity

Both projects started around the same time, with HitKeep beginning 1 year ago and Open Analytics 3 months ago.

HitKeep wins
Licensing

HitKeep uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Open Analytics's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics.

Comparable
Hosting & Deployment

Both HitKeep and Open Analytics offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.