Learn how HitKeep and Open Analytics differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
21 hours agoRepository age
1 yearVersion
v2.15.0License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
pascalebeier/hitkeep
Last 30 days
Last commit
4 days agoRepository age
3 monthsVersion
v0.8.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
openanalytics
Both HitKeep and Open Analytics have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Open Analytics significantly outpaces HitKeep in community adoption with 642 stars compared to 100 stars on GitHub. This 6.4x difference suggests Open Analytics has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Open Analytics has 53 forks, indicating growing developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with HitKeep last updated 21 hours ago and Open Analytics 4 days ago.
Both projects started around the same time, with HitKeep beginning 1 year ago and Open Analytics 3 months ago.
HitKeep uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Open Analytics's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics.
Both HitKeep and Open Analytics offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs